Do You Care If a Guy is Circumcised or Not?

Link: => graphdeletot.nnmcloud.ru/d?s=YToyOntzOjc6InJlZmVyZXIiO3M6MzY6Imh0dHA6Ly9iYW5kY2FtcC5jb21fZG93bmxvYWRfcG9zdGVyLyI7czozOiJrZXkiO3M6Mjg6IldvbWVuIHdobyBsb3ZlIHVuY2lyY3VtY2lzZWQiO30=


If there are issues with cleanliness just get him to take better care of himself. Maybe I was more sexually attracted to him than to the others. If you truly love a person and find him sexy, you won't care if he has a little extra skin around his penis where your previous sexual partners have not.

On one hand, I'd like to spare them the confusion of realizing that their penis looks different from other penises. Another aspect I hear is that it feels better for the girl when the guy is uncircumcised, so maybe girls wouldn't enjoy it as much. The bride came out and joined the dancing.

Why Some Women Choose to Get Circumcised

Uncircumcised guys are like nasty sausages ready to pop out. Uncut men are better in the sack. My results conclude that uncut men are better in the sack. Cut is the best, uncut lovers often have a nasty smelly mess under the foreskin. A major it is not going to happen Jack, especially when considering oral. My friend vommed on this dude when she went down on him and peeled it back. All the funk got on under her fingernails. Uncircumcised dicks are a deal breaker in my opinion. The uncircumcised was the worst lover fathomable. He did not use his parts optimally. I wish he had been more hygienic too. I prefer my honeybun right now. He has a gorgeous you-know-what that is clean and delicious. The uncircumcised penis has a foul smell that I cannot stand. In more civil writing, being uncircumcised really does not have the benefits that uncircumcised people claim. First of all, many but not all uncircumcised penises produce enough smegma to where hygiene becomes an issue. Women are very offended by this. Secondly, there is no increase in pleasure for the woman simply because there is a disgusting flap of skin. Most importantly it looks quite disgusting and women find that extremely unattractive. Uncircumcised penises are just aesthetically unpleasant to the eye. I dated my boyfriend for 2 years before he got women who love uncircumcised done. Its a really nice change…the head is just out there all the time. And guys with uncut dicks tend to be more appreciative of head because their sensitivity to it seems more heightened. The gliding sensation from the foreskin just does it for me. The uncircumcised men have been the only ones who I orgasm from vaginal intercourse alone easily, even during casual encounters. I really, really, really prefer uncircumcised men. I mean, why would I prefer a man missing a significant part of his penis. Pros: They are easier to jerk off. My first run-in with an uncircumcised penis made me realize I never wanted to jerk off a circumcised one again. Why is it wearing a turtleneck. It takes some getting used to—different texture, smell, etc. The foreskin is there to lubricate and ease penetration. I found cut guys could go longer being less sensitive. Does it matter if Brad Pitt has or does not have a foreskin. Cut is more hygienic, uncut erotic and natural. I dislike the look of a circumcised penis. Cut is good too but will more likely result in irritation. To me the uncircumcised penis feels a little better less rough during intercourse than the circumcised penis. And like the other girls said, I also think the foreskin is fun to play with especially when you are giving a handjob. But I generally like them either way. For oral, circumcised is better. Circumcised looks scarred and mutilated, which is not an attractive look. It looks altogether very strange. The foreskin is attractive, I think it looks really cute. And uncircumcised is far easier to stimulate manually and just generally more fun, as well as having many more nerve endings and being more sensitive. An uncut one is fun to play with, rolling women who love uncircumcised skin around with my tongue. Someday I might have an uncut one deep in me. The problem with uncircumcised men is they do not keep it clean, and they experience more infections that way. The uncircumcised felt like silk, and just gave me different sensations. As for the orgasm…well, they have always been easier to achieve with the circumcised. I women who love uncircumcised it, and it is quite common as the man ages. Despite best efforts to keep clean, any skin that is folded on top of other skin will tend to sweat and smell rather quickly—even after a good shower. Every female prefers a circumcised male. What is noticeable are uncircumcised penises. Why would I want a guy that has an odor down there all the time, unless they go wash up pretty good every-time before any sexual contact. I mean do guys like ugly vaginas that have an odor. A cut penis is basically a dildo since there are no movable parts like in a whole penis. The fact is natural sex meaning intact sex is so much better. Less friction, more pleasure for both the man and the woman. Circumcision scars are extremely ugly. I had sex with a circumcised man, and it was the worst sex of my life. It hurt, his penis was rough, and circumcision scars are extremely ugly. My husband is uncircumcised and I love his penis exactly the way it is. It feels 100x better than the circumcised penis, and he is so much more sensitive to the touch. No Aussie woman wants a foreskin that resembles an elephant trunk inside her. Their sensitive spots are a lot more sensitive and you can just tell that they are having a lot more fun; the way they arch their back and moan. As a nurse I am totally against circumcision. We need to start teaching high-school students about this as it seems to be a widely believed myth. I find the circumcision scar to be visually less than pleasing. There are so many more options of things to do. I will never be with another man who is circumcised. I never have to worry about going dry, it lasts much longer and the extra skin seems to rub just the right women who love uncircumcised, I will never be with another man who is circumcised. I can understand how some women equate uncut men to being smelly. But women who love uncircumcised playing with it a couple times Women who love uncircumcised noticed a smell. So, I can understand how some women equate uncut men to being smelly. The uncircumcised was better, added width. Circumcised look more scary to me, dunno why, humans are strange breed. I can tell you that, for me, uncircumcised is much better. The foreskin acts as a clitoral stimulant during intercourse, and, because the penis is more sensitive, the man is more likely to fuck less forcefully than his uncircumcised counterparts. I am currently seeing a gorgeous, uncut man, and the sex is sublime. That said, a circumcised man can also be amazing in bed. I have had lovers sans foreskin who blew me away in bed because they knew what they were doing. The foreskin rubbing the clit sensation can be duplicated with grinding pelvises for increased clitoral stimulation, or by applying a finger or vibrator to the clit during intercourse. Fundamentally, what makes a man a great lover is primarily skills, sensitivity, good communication, enthusiasm and willingness to please. But a man with a working foreskin may not have to try as hard to get the woman in his life off. An uncircumcised penis is a prime location for anaerobic bacteria to thrive. My ex would get this white film over his penis head that tasted gross and smelled even worse. I would recommend parents just go ahead and get their male children circumcised as infants to save him the hassle of dealing with his foreskin when he grows up. Before we would have vaginal or oral sex I would request that he wash it with soap and water and thoroughly dry it with a towel. The sex with my ex was good but I think that was more because I loved him and he had sexual experience and less because he was uncircumcised. The cut ones were much better. A much better experience for me, both for oral sex, anal sex and vaginal sex. My first man was Muslim from Morocco so he was circumcised. The second was a white American so he was circumcised. The third was Latino so he was uncircumcised and the fourth was an Indian man raised Hindu so he was uncircumcised. The cut ones were much better. Of course, other factors could explain this. Maybe, because I was a virgin when I had the Muslim, it was all new and wonderful to me so I had a better experience. I was very hungry and eager for sex with him but not so much with the others. Maybe I was more sexually attracted to him than to the others. Maybe women who love uncircumcised first two were better lovers. Maybe we had a better emotional and psychological connection and so that was why the sex was better. Maybe I was just sexually incompatible or only semi compatible with the last two. Still, I have a feeling that the foreskin was the issue—or at least part of the issue. Perhaps a man without a foreskin gives me less dick and that works better for me. And because it works better for me, it works better for the both of us. So I hope that my husband, whoever he may be, be cut. I like it better because it makes oral sex a lot easier and makes vaginal sex easier and less painful. If you are trying to decide women who love uncircumcised to get circumcised or not—get circumcised. I am completely turned off by men that are uncircumcised. The first time I ever saw an uncut dick, I thought there was something wrong with it. Sorry guys, but us Jews had the right idea. Usually men who are not circumcised have better hygiene. And the one time the man had a botched circumcision, and a keloid scar. I do not want to experience one either.

Man 4: That it's gross and dirty. The uncircumcised was better, added width. The injury will typically heal within seven to 10 days, the says. It stands to reason that as a result of this greater sensitivity, intact men are less likely to engage in the not-so-pleasant jackhammer style of sex -- I've found that to be the case, at least. And what they do is they take apart the hut of the mother and father and they divide the branches.